<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Mini&#8221; VS &#8220;Traditional&#8221; Websites? And the winner is&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.igottatellyou.com/blog/mini-vs-traditional-websites-and-the-winner-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.igottatellyou.com/blog/mini-vs-traditional-websites-and-the-winner-is/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:36:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodor</title>
		<link>http://www.igottatellyou.com/blog/mini-vs-traditional-websites-and-the-winner-is/comment-page-1/#comment-216700</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igottatellyou.com/blog/mini-vs-traditional-websites-and-the-winner-is/#comment-216700</guid>
		<description>Hi 

a wonderful idea &quot;these mini sites&quot; but I thing when you have a &quot; classical site with a menu and many categories&quot; you pay a &quot; hosting for this web site&quot; however if you create a series of mini sites you should pay a hosting for each minisite
Am-I wrong?

Best wishes
Bodor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi </p>
<p>a wonderful idea &#8220;these mini sites&#8221; but I thing when you have a &#8221; classical site with a menu and many categories&#8221; you pay a &#8221; hosting for this web site&#8221; however if you create a series of mini sites you should pay a hosting for each minisite<br />
Am-I wrong?</p>
<p>Best wishes<br />
Bodor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steffan</title>
		<link>http://www.igottatellyou.com/blog/mini-vs-traditional-websites-and-the-winner-is/comment-page-1/#comment-215785</link>
		<dc:creator>steffan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igottatellyou.com/blog/mini-vs-traditional-websites-and-the-winner-is/#comment-215785</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Good couple of articles yet again (including the tips on what makes areader friendly site). The thing that I have found with mini sites is that it allows you to focus solely on the job in hand without being diverted a way from it with regards to having to constantly add to a blog or newsletter. 

That means that this extra free time can be used to add useful content to what you are trying to promote and if necessary to add additional material or information to make the site even more attractive to visitors / customers.

Add the time it saves you in purely creating a mini site compared to some of the larger &quot;behemoths&quot; also gives you longer to work on the necessary SEO and other traffic producing techniques.

Steffan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Good couple of articles yet again (including the tips on what makes areader friendly site). The thing that I have found with mini sites is that it allows you to focus solely on the job in hand without being diverted a way from it with regards to having to constantly add to a blog or newsletter. </p>
<p>That means that this extra free time can be used to add useful content to what you are trying to promote and if necessary to add additional material or information to make the site even more attractive to visitors / customers.</p>
<p>Add the time it saves you in purely creating a mini site compared to some of the larger &#8220;behemoths&#8221; also gives you longer to work on the necessary SEO and other traffic producing techniques.</p>
<p>Steffan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Kirkland</title>
		<link>http://www.igottatellyou.com/blog/mini-vs-traditional-websites-and-the-winner-is/comment-page-1/#comment-215760</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Kirkland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igottatellyou.com/blog/mini-vs-traditional-websites-and-the-winner-is/#comment-215760</guid>
		<description>Jim

I have been online since 1999 and making a very good income from mini sites. So I have to agree with you 100% about everything you said.

These people in the forums have for the most part NEVER done it or anything else. They just say the same things they here other people saying and just blindly repeat it as the truth. The problem is they have never doing anything but TALK. 

Go to google and search for “pergola plans” you will find that I’m #8 with a mini site. 

SEO?

Well that is a very large part of how I make my living. Google “garage plans” I’m number 5.  Even though garageplansplus.com is not a mini site but how do you fit 3,000+ plans into anything other then a huge site. But I am the first to say the conv. on that site suck as compared to pergola-plans.

But you are right for the average person SEO is just a dream. Is it hard? NO but most people don’t have the discipline to do it.

The long tail is one of the best books I have ever read on niches. There are more niches created ever day. This is a time of unlimited opportunity if people would act on it.

Statement number #4.  Just start small and then go big.

Just one site a month would allow most people to make a living in a year or less.

Statement #6 the google slap if for people who don’t know what they are doing.

Thanks
Charles Kirkland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim</p>
<p>I have been online since 1999 and making a very good income from mini sites. So I have to agree with you 100% about everything you said.</p>
<p>These people in the forums have for the most part NEVER done it or anything else. They just say the same things they here other people saying and just blindly repeat it as the truth. The problem is they have never doing anything but TALK. </p>
<p>Go to google and search for “pergola plans” you will find that I’m #8 with a mini site. </p>
<p>SEO?</p>
<p>Well that is a very large part of how I make my living. Google “garage plans” I’m number 5.  Even though garageplansplus.com is not a mini site but how do you fit 3,000+ plans into anything other then a huge site. But I am the first to say the conv. on that site suck as compared to pergola-plans.</p>
<p>But you are right for the average person SEO is just a dream. Is it hard? NO but most people don’t have the discipline to do it.</p>
<p>The long tail is one of the best books I have ever read on niches. There are more niches created ever day. This is a time of unlimited opportunity if people would act on it.</p>
<p>Statement number #4.  Just start small and then go big.</p>
<p>Just one site a month would allow most people to make a living in a year or less.</p>
<p>Statement #6 the google slap if for people who don’t know what they are doing.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Charles Kirkland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davion &#124; Secrets of Affiliate Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.igottatellyou.com/blog/mini-vs-traditional-websites-and-the-winner-is/comment-page-1/#comment-215596</link>
		<dc:creator>Davion &#124; Secrets of Affiliate Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igottatellyou.com/blog/mini-vs-traditional-websites-and-the-winner-is/#comment-215596</guid>
		<description>I agree that &quot;mini sites&quot; are powerful and targeted for whatever specific intent they were built for. In fact, I own a network of such blogs for various niches. And I can tell you that the conversion rates are high! Plus, these are very easy to create and maintain. But, one point to note is, it is still practical and wise to own huge sites as well as your flagship site. It can be a blog which allows interaction with your customers, just like what you have here.

Davion
http://www.secrets-of-affiliatemarketing.com
http://www.davionwong.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that &#8220;mini sites&#8221; are powerful and targeted for whatever specific intent they were built for. In fact, I own a network of such blogs for various niches. And I can tell you that the conversion rates are high! Plus, these are very easy to create and maintain. But, one point to note is, it is still practical and wise to own huge sites as well as your flagship site. It can be a blog which allows interaction with your customers, just like what you have here.</p>
<p>Davion<br />
<a href="http://www.secrets-of-affiliatemarketing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.secrets-of-affiliatemarketing.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.davionwong.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.davionwong.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing Consultant - Justin Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.igottatellyou.com/blog/mini-vs-traditional-websites-and-the-winner-is/comment-page-1/#comment-215559</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing Consultant - Justin Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igottatellyou.com/blog/mini-vs-traditional-websites-and-the-winner-is/#comment-215559</guid>
		<description>I could not agree with you more Jim. Small focused sites always do better, and they are less work to run! Combined with a simple wordpress blog to push out some articles and build your SEO is the next step, but that’s about as far as you need to go. KISS... keep it simple stupid!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree with you more Jim. Small focused sites always do better, and they are less work to run! Combined with a simple wordpress blog to push out some articles and build your SEO is the next step, but that’s about as far as you need to go. KISS&#8230; keep it simple stupid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
